Difference Between 2 Sigma vs 3 Sigma Control Charts
written by: N Nayab
• edited by: Jean Scheid
• updated: 2/23/2011
Two-sigma limits and three-sigma limits are indicators of measurement accuracy used in control charts. When comparing 2 sigma vs 3 sigma control charts, 3 sigma control charts help ensure process stability whereas 2 sigma control charts are used to detect small shifts in the project or process.
Control charts help achieve and maintain process stability by identifying the state where the process displayed consistency in the past and expects to do so in the future. When the data from the control chart indicates variation in process quality, due to both random and special causes, the process is out of control.
slide 2 of 5
2 Sigma Limits vs 3 Sigma Limits
Two sigma limits and 3 sigma limits are indicators of the accuracy of the measurement method used in control charts.
Sigma is the measure of standard deviation or, the extent to which data can vary in a given distribution. A smaller sigma level denotes less variability, or close data points.
Two sigma limits indicate data chosen randomly from a set of normally distributed data that has a 95% of probability of being within the acceptable standard deviation.
Three sigma limits indicate data chosen randomly from a set of normally distributed data and has a 99.73% of probability of being within the acceptable standard deviation, translating into a possibility of 1,350 defects per million opportunities.
A 2 sigma control limit, therefore, indicates the extent to which data deviates from the 95% probability, and a 3 sigma control limit indicates the extent to which the defects deviate from the acceptable 1,350 defects.
In statistical control, 1 sigma is the lowest sigma and 6 sigma the highest. A process attains stability when data in the control chart falls within 3-sigma limits from the standard deviation. For this exact reason, the traditional control chart formulated by Walter Shewhart in 1924 and most control charts since have used 3-sigma limits to test the deviance of data.
slide 3 of 5
Statistical Performance of 2 Sigma vs 3 Sigma Control Charts
Three-sigma Shewhart-type control charts effectively detect medium to large shifts in data but are also insensitive to small shifts of data. These charts have a major drawback of having no memory and using only the last plotted data. Previous observations do not influence the probability of future out-of-control signals.
A time-weighted 2-sigma control chart is an alternative to the Shewhart-type 3-sigma charts. Such charts make use of historical data points and detect small shifts of 1 sigma and 2 sigma levels. 2 sigma limits are, however, insufficient to ascertain process stability, and as such, 2 sigma control charts show only if there is a requirement to ascertain extremely sensitive process deviation.
slide 4 of 5
The major difference between 2 sigma vs 3 sigma control charts are that the former finds ways to detect small shifts from the standard deviation but not necessarily signifying process instability whereas, the latter finds application to detect medium to large shifts in data from the mean.
The appropriate type of control chart depends on the classification of the data, type of underlying distribution and intent of application. Usually a 3-sigma analysis takes place first, followed by a 2-sigma analysis follows if needed.
slide 5 of 5
Engineering Statistics Handbook. Retrieved from http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/pmc/section3/pmc31.htm
What Are Control Charts? Retrieved from http://www.sqconline.com/six-sigma-control-charts.html
Vishwajit Joshi. A Roadmap for Using Time-Weighted Control Charts. Retrieved from http://www.isixsigma.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=234:a-roadmap-for-using-time-weighted-control-charts&Itemid=201